Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are an important class of model for mapping taxa spatially and are a key tool for tackling biodiversity loss. However, most common SDMs depend on presence–absence data and, despite the accumulation and exponential growth of biological occurrence data across the globe, the available data are predominantly presence-only (i.e. they lack real absences). Although presence-only SDMs do exist, they inevitably require assumptions about absences of the considered taxa and they are specified mostly for single species and, thus, do not exploit fully the information in related taxa. This greatly limits the utility of global biodiversity databases such as GBIF. Here, we present a Bayesian-based SDM for multiple species that operates directly on presence-only data by exploiting the joint distribution between the multiple ecological processes and, crucially, identifies the sampling effort per taxa which allows inference on absences. The model was applied to two case studies. One, focusing on taxonomically diverse taxa over central Mexico and another focusing on the monophyletic family Cactacea over continental Mexico. In both cases, the model was able to identify the ecological and sampling effort processes for each taxon using only the presence observations, environmental and anthropological data.

Highlights

  • Estimating the geographical distribution of species, conditioned to their ecological niche, is crucial for assessing the risk of species extinctions, habitat restoration and forecasting the effects of climate change on biodiversity [1,2]

  • We demonstrated that the use of an external informative sample and a common random spatial effect increased the model’s predictive accuracy in single Presence-only SDMs (POSDMs) [49]

  • A positive correlation for Disocactus was found, a species reported to inhabit tropical rain forests (TRF), and negative correlation for all the genera associated with shurblands and deserts (SD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Estimating the geographical distribution of species, conditioned to their ecological niche, is crucial for assessing the risk of species extinctions, habitat restoration and forecasting the effects of climate change on biodiversity [1,2]. SDMs are effective in characterizing the natural distributions of species when the sampling observations are properly designed to fit the model’s assumptions [4,5]. These assumptions typically are: (i) the probability for a target species (P) to occupy a given area is independent from other species [6,7] and (ii) P is at equilibrium with its environment. Species are present across all environmentally suitable areas and are absent in unsuitable environments [8]. While the value of SDMs in decisionmaking and environmental assessments is indisputable, the aforementioned assumptions greatly limit their scope in application

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call