Abstract
Two recession-derivative indicators (RDIs) have been used extensively as forecast objects in business cycle prediction, viz. (1) the target variable takes value 1 if there is a recession starting exactly at a specific horizon in the future, and (2) the target variable takes value 1 if there is a recession starting any time over a specified period in the future. Using daily yield spread as an illustrative predictor, we formally and quantitatively compare the two RDIs using the receiver operating characteristics analysis. Over 1962-2021 covering eight NBER recessions, we find that generally the second RDI, ceteris paribus, will make the the predictor better performing. However, the first RDI can generate better-looking and more useful predictions under certain scenarios, depending on forecast horizon, recession duration and time profile of signals. We also consider a semiannual chronology proposed by Peláez (J Macroecon 45:384-393, 2015) and find that its performance is in the middle of the other two. Our analysis suggests that the choice of a particular RDI should be dictated by the needs of forecast user in a particular decision making context.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
