Abstract

Alphaviruses infect a diverse range of host organisms including mosquitoes, mammals, and birds. The enigmatic alphavirus non-structural protein 3 (nsP3) has an intrinsically disordered, C-terminal hypervariable domain (HVD) that can interact with a variety of host proteins associated with stress granules (SGs). The HVD displays the highest variability across the more than 30 known alphaviruses, yet it also contains several motifs that are conserved amongst different subgroups of alphaviruses. For some alphaviruses, specific nsP3–SG protein interactions are essential for virus replication. However, it remains difficult to attribute general roles to these virus-host interactions, as multiple amino acid motifs in the HDV display a degree of redundancy and previous studies were performed with a limited number of alphaviruses. To better understand nsP3-host protein interactions we conducted comprehensive co-localization experiments with the nsP3s of 20 diverse alphaviruses: chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Bebaru, Barmah Forest, Getah, Mayaro, Middelburg, O'nyong-nyong, Ross River QML and T48, Una, Whataroa, Southern Elephant Seal, Eilat, Tai Forest (TAFV), Venezuelan/Eastern/Western equine encephalitis (V/E/WEEV) and the aquatic Salmonid alphavirus (SAV), with three different SG proteins (G3BP and its insect homolog Rasputin, FMRP) and BIN1 in mammalian and mosquito cell lines. Despite that all terrestrial alphavirus nsP3s contained at least one BIN1-binding motif (PxPxPR), not all nsP3s co-localized with BIN1. Further, all alphaviruses except SAV, TAFV and VEEV displayed co-localization with G3BP. Although viruses lacking FGxF-like motifs contained Agenet-like domain binding motifs to facilitate interaction with FMRP, cytoplasmic nsP3 granules of all tested alphaviruses co-localized with FMRP. Crispr-Cas9 knockout of G3BP in mammalian cells abolished nsP3-FMRP co-localization for all alphaviruses except V/E/WEEV nsP3s that bind FMRP directly. G3BP knockout also changed nsP3 subcellular localization of Bebaru, Barmah Forest, Getah, and Sindbis viruses. Taken together this study paints a more detailed picture of the diverse interactions between alphavirus nsP3 and SG-associated host proteins. The interaction between nsP3 and G3BP clearly plays a central role and results in recruitment of additional host proteins such as FMRP. However, direct binding of FMRP can make the interaction with G3BP redundant which exemplifies the alternate evolutionary paths of alphavirus subgroups.

Highlights

  • The Alphavirus genus currently contains over 30 members spread all over the world in various hosts and vectors (Strauss and Strauss, 1994; Meshram et al, 2018)

  • We observed that V/W/EEEV-nsP3 did not readily co-localize with BIN1 despite having a putative binding motif, while all alphaviruses with PxPxPR and FGDF-like motifs were able to co-localize with BIN1

  • We found that alphavirus nsP3s containing an FGDF-like motif co-localized with G3BP and that the nsP3s containing the Agenet-like domain binding motif colocalized with Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Alphavirus genus currently contains over 30 members spread all over the world in various hosts and vectors (Strauss and Strauss, 1994; Meshram et al, 2018). The currently available knowledge is primarily based on investigations of only a few key members of the Alphavirus genus, i.e., Semliki Forest virus (SFV), Sindbis virus (SINV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV), Ross River virus (RRV), and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV). The mosquito-borne alphaviruses have historically been divided into two groups based on the symptoms they cause: arthritogenic and encephalitic alphaviruses (Strauss et al, 1984). The genus can be categorized based on their geographical origin, namely Old World (OW) and New World (NW) alphaviruses in which OW alphaviruses tend to be associated with arthritic symptoms and NW alphaviruses with encephalitic symptoms and more frequently a lethal outcome (Weaver and Frolov, 2005; Suhrbier et al, 2012; Fros and Pijlman, 2016). No matter which type of grouping is the most suitable one, several virus-host proteinprotein interactions are specific for parts of the genus

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call