Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are critical for regulating CD4 and CD8 T cell immunity, controlling Th1, Th2, and Th17 commitment, generating inducible Tregs, and mediating tolerance. It is believed that distinct DC subsets have evolved to control these different immune outcomes. However, how DC subsets mount different responses to inflammatory and/or tolerogenic signals in order to accomplish their divergent functions remains unclear. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) provides an excellent model for investigating responses in closely related splenic DC subsets, as all subsets express the LPS receptor TLR4 and respond to LPS in vitro. However, previous studies of the LPS-induced DC transcriptome have been performed only on mixed DC populations. Moreover, comparisons of the in vivo response of two closely related DC subsets to LPS stimulation have not been reported in the literature to date. We compared the transcriptomes of murine splenic CD8 and CD11b DC subsets after in vivo LPS stimulation, using RNA-Seq and systems biology approaches. We identified subset-specific gene signatures, which included multiple functional immune mediators unique to each subset. To explain the observed subset-specific differences, we used a network analysis approach. While both DC subsets used a conserved set of transcription factors and major signalling pathways, the subsets showed differential regulation of sets of genes that ‘fine-tune’ the network Hubs expressed in common. We propose a model in which signalling through common pathway components is ‘fine-tuned’ by transcriptional control of subset-specific modulators, thus allowing for distinct functional outcomes in closely related DC subsets. We extend this analysis to comparable datasets from the literature and confirm that our model can account for cell subset-specific responses to LPS stimulation in multiple subpopulations in mouse and man.

Highlights

  • Dendritic cells (DCs) are key regulators of T cell responses

  • Using a hyper-stringent method for choosing differentially expressed genes in the DESeq R package [33], we show that CD8 and CD11b splenic DC subsets respond differently to in vivo LPS stimulation, and that many of the transcriptional changes previously defined in the LPS response of unfractionated DCs are present in only one of the two subsets

  • We confirmed that our enrichment and gating strategy for steady-state and LPS-treated DCs excluded monocyte-derived DCs identified on the basis of coexpression of FccR1 (CD64) and FceR1a [35] (Figure S1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dendritic cells (DCs) are key regulators of T cell responses. DCs are essential for priming naive T cells and are believed to control their effector fate. Rather than comprising linear pathways, immune signalling involves interactions between thousands of distinct proteins communicating within a complex network These networks are organised by a set of highly connected proteins (known as Hubs) that are essential for receiving and distributing multiple signals within the network [3,4,5]. Due to their key role in the connectivity of complex signalling networks, Hubs both reflect mechanism and provide biomarkers for cell types and signalling events [3,4,5]. It is not yet known whether differences in Hub usage contribute to cell-specific differences in signalling networks

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.