Abstract

ObjectivesTo provide a systematic review of brain injury and altered brain development in moderate-late preterm (MLPT) infants as compared to very preterm and term infants. Study designA systematic search in five databases was performed in January 2020.Original research papers on incidence of brain injury and papers using quantitative data on brain development in MLPT infants were selected. The Johanna Briggs Institute ‘Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data’ was used for quality appraisal. Data extraction included: imaging modality, incidences of brain injury, brain volumes, 2D-measurements and diffusivity values. ResultsIn total, 24 studies were eligible. Most studies had a moderate quality. Twenty studies reported on the incidence of brain injury in MLPT infants. The incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) ranged from 0.0% to 23.5% and of white matter injury (WMI) from 0.5% to 10.8%. One study reported the incidence of arterial infarction (0.3%) and none of cerebellar hemorrhage. Eleven studies compared incidences of brain injury between MLPT infants and very preterm or term infants. Five studies reported signs of altered brain development in MLPT infants. ConclusionsThe incidences of IVH and WMI in MLPT infants varied widely between studies. Other abnormalities were sparsely reported. Evidence regarding a higher or lower incidence of brain injury in MLPT infants compared to very preterm or term infants is weak due to moderate methodological quality of reported studies. There is limited evidence suggesting a difference in brain development between MLPT and term infants.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.