Abstract

Despite its prevalence and disease burden, several chasms still exist with regard to the pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder (BD). Polypharmacy is commonly encountered as a significant proportion of patients remain symptomatic, and the management of the depressive phase of the illness is a particular challenge. Gabapentin and pregabalin have often been prescribed off-label in spite of a paucity of evidence and clinical practice guidelines to support its use. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available human clinical trials and inform evidence-based pharmacological approaches to BD management. A total of six randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 open-label trials involving the use of gabapentin and pregabalin in BD patients were reviewed. Overall, the studies show that gabapentin and its related drug pregabalin do not have significant clinical efficacy as either monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for BD. Gabapentin and pregabalin are probably ineffective for acute mania based on the findings of RCT, with only small open-label trials to support its potential adjunctive role. However, its effects on the long-term outcomes of BD remain to be elucidated. The evidence base was significantly limited by the generally small sample sizes and the trials also had heterogeneous designs and generally high risk of bias.

Highlights

  • Bipolar disorder (BD) is a debilitating mental illness that affects more than 1% of the world’s population [1]

  • A total of 1186 records were found from the database search, with 767 records marked ineligible by automated filters and 114 records removed as duplicates

  • Due to this heterogeneity in designs, it was challenging to discern the source of the therapeutic effect, making it difficult to attribute any observed benefit to solely gabapentin or pregabalin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a debilitating mental illness that affects more than 1% of the world’s population [1]. Its lifetime prevalence in adults across 11 countries was estimated to be 0.4% [2]. The prevalence rate increases to 3–4% [2], making it one of the main causes of disability among youth [1]. II) [1,3] This predisposes the individual with BD to a significantly higher risk of death by suicide [4], an unfortunate clinical outcome that remains a challenging and pertinent issue [5]. It has been suggested that sensory processes unique to individuals are implicated in their corresponding emotional patterns, making BD a very heterogenous condition [6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call