Abstract

Background: Formulation and working psychologically with teams is considered a fundamental part of the role of a clinical psychologist. Quantitative studies have found staff find team formulations a positive, useful experience. Aims: This review aims to utilize a Thematic Synthesis to combine qualitative studies on staff experiences of participating in team formulations and explore what benefits staff perceive from the process. The review also aims to provide a thorough quality appraisal of the included research. Method: A Thematic Synthesis was completed on qualitative studies which met the required inclusion criteria. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist was used to appraise the included research. Results: The studies included in the review were of a mixed quality, and in some instances there was an insufficient amount of detail to complete an accurate assessment. Overall, seven themes were identified across the studies. Conclusions: The current review highlights the importance of team formulation in general practice for both enhancing staff understanding of service users but also improving professional confidence and validation. The review also highlighted some of the barriers to staff practicing team formulations.

Highlights

  • The use of team formulations with staff groups has become an increasingly popular practice within Clinical Psychology in the United Kingdom as a means to engage and work collaboratively with teams (Division of Clinical Psychology [DCP], 2011)

  • This review aims to analyze U.K.-based qualitative studies on staff experiences of participating in team formulations using Thomas and Harden’s (2008) method of Thematic Synthesis

  • The current review demonstrates the potential benefits of team formulation in mental health settings, highlighting the impact of an increased use of psychotherapeutically informed approaches and working psychologically in the modern National Health Service (NHS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of team formulations with staff groups has become an increasingly popular practice within Clinical Psychology in the United Kingdom as a means to engage and work collaboratively with teams (Division of Clinical Psychology [DCP], 2011). Working with teams (such as facilitating team formulations and providing consultation) is considered a fundamental role of practitioner psychologists by regulatory bodies (Health and Care Professions Council, 2015). A systematic review completed by Geach et al (2018) found that no uniform definition was reported across studies a common focus was established as being a forum to share psychological understanding of an individual’s presenting difficulties while guiding interventions. Conclusions: The current review highlights the importance of team formulation in general practice for both enhancing staff understanding of service users and improving professional confidence and validation. The review highlighted some of the barriers to staff practicing team formulations

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.