Abstract

BackgroundSupported asthma self-management improves health outcomes. However, people with limited health literacy, especially in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), may need tailored interventions to enable them to realise the benefits. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of asthma self-management interventions targeted at people with limited health literacy and to identify strategies associated with effective programmes.MethodsFollowing Cochrane methodology, we searched ten databases (January 1990 – June 2018; updated October 2019), without language restriction. We included controlled experimental studies whose interventions targeted health literacy to improve asthma self-management. Selection of papers, extraction of data and quality assessment were done independently by two reviewers. The primary outcomes were clinical (asthma control) and implementation (adoption/adherence to intervention). Analysis was narrative.ResultsWe screened 4318 titles and abstracts, reviewed 52 full-texts and included five trials. One trial was conducted in a LMIC. Risk of bias was low in one trial and high in the other four studies. Clinical outcomes were reported in two trials, both at high risk of bias: one of which reported a reduction in unscheduled care (number of visits in 6-month (SD); Intervention:0.9 (1.2) vs Control:1.8 (2.4), P = 0.001); the other showed no effect. None reported uptake or adherence to the intervention. Behavioural change strategies typically focused on improving an individual’s psychological and physical capacity to enact behaviour (eg, targeting asthma-related knowledge or comprehension). Only two interventions also targeted motivation; none sought to improve opportunity. Less than half of the interventions used specific self-management strategies (eg, written asthma action plan) with tailoring to limited health literacy status. Different approaches (eg, video-based and pictorial action plans) were used to provide education.ConclusionsThe paucity of studies and diversity of the interventions to support people with limited health literacy to self-manage their asthma meant that the impact on health outcomes remains unclear. Given the proportion of the global population who have limited health literacy skills, this is a research priority.Protocol registrationPROSPERO CRD 42018118974

Highlights

  • Asthma self-management support, including written action plans and regular reviews by healthcare professionals, improves health outcomes [1,2,3,4]

  • Systematic reviews and guidelines highlight that cultural or age-related tailoring enables the successful implementation of supported self-management, rarely specify tailoring for people with limited health literacy

  • Geographical area and socioeconomic status: Four studies were described as set in an urban environment [20,21,22,24]; three described their population as of low socioeconomic status [20,21,24], the fourth had less than a third in the ‘working-class group’ [22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Asthma self-management support, including written action plans and regular reviews by healthcare professionals, improves health outcomes [1,2,3,4]. Systematic reviews and guidelines highlight that cultural or age-related tailoring enables the successful implementation of supported self-management, rarely specify tailoring for people with limited health literacy. This is a significant oversight, as health literacy is a problem globally [5], and a particular challenge in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Given the proportion of the global population who have limited health literacy skills, this is a research priority

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call