Abstract

Students with disorders of intellectual development (ID) experience challenges in reading and writing, indicating the need for research-based interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of reading and writing interventions for students aged 4–19 with disorders of ID using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs (QEDs). We conducted electronic searches of relevant databases, backward and forward searches, and contacted experts in the field. Based on predefined criteria, nine studies were included in the systematic review, and seven were included in the meta-analysis. The reading interventions included decoding strategies, often combined with sight-word and supplemental instructions appropriate to the participants’ adaptive and cognitive skills. None of the studies aimed to increase writing skills. The overall mean effect size from the reading interventions for trained reading was large (g = 0.95, 95% CI = [0.51, 1.38]), for transfer reading small-to-moderate (g = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.20, 0.78]) and for transfer writing small (g = 0.04, 95% CI = [−0.36, 0.44]). Students with disorders of ID can benefit from reading interventions combining decoding strategies and sight word reading. There is a need for RCT and QED studies investigating writing interventions for students with disorders of ID only.

Highlights

  • Students with disorders of intellectual development are likely to face challenges in reading and writing acquisition because of significant limitations to cognitive functioning (IQ ≤ 69) and adaptive behaviour [1]

  • Four of the studies were considered to be at high risk of bias [20,35,36,37]

  • Our results show that students with intellectual development (ID) disorders can improve their reading ski participating in predesigned interventions tested out by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs (QEDs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Students with disorders of intellectual development (hereafter disorders of ID) are likely to face challenges in reading and writing acquisition because of significant limitations to cognitive functioning (IQ ≤ 69) and adaptive behaviour [1]. Limitations in speech, language [2], and phonological skills [3,4] are common in students with disorders of ID, as are challenges with oral motor skills [5] and fine motor skills [6]. These are all skills that are commonly found to be associated with reading and writing acquisition [7]. The studies seem to be based on how to teach either reading

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call