Abstract

Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an appreciable proportion of the communicable disease burden globally. We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 9596 articles were identified, of which 517 were assessed in detail and of which 26 met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. Seven air disinfection techniques, including UV-C light, filtration, and face masks, among others, were applied to 13 different bacterial pathogens. More than 80% of studies suggested that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating or killing bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition. However, it was not possible to compare these techniques because of methodological heterogeneity and the relatively small number of the studies. Laboratory studies are useful for demonstrating proof-of-concept and performance under controlled conditions. However, the generalisability of their findings to person-to-person transmission in real-world settings is unclear for most of the pathogens and techniques we assessed.

Highlights

  • A total of seven disinfection methods were identified across the 26 articles, including UV-C, filtration, masks, photocatalytic oxidation, electrostatic because they were not relevant

  • A total of seven disinfection methods were identified across the 26 articles, including UV-C, filtration, masks, photocatalytic oxidation, electrostatic fields, cold plasma, and nanotechnology-based techniques with six studies utilising more than one method

  • More than 80% of studies suggest that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating airborne bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition, the absolute reductions may not be relevant to human infection

Read more

Summary

Objectives

We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call