Abstract

BackgroundThe Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) are discovered to be tightly associated with cancers, so accurately detecting them is one of the most important tasks in the cancer genomics. A series of CNAs detection methods have been proposed and new ones are still being developed. Due to the complexity of CNAs in cancers, no CNAs detection method has been accepted as the gold standard caller. Several evaluation works have made attempts to reveal typical CNAs detection methods’ performance. Limited by the scale of evaluation data, these different comparison works don’t reach a consensus and the researchers are still confused on how to choose one proper CNAs caller for their analysis. Therefore, it needs a more comprehensive evaluation of typical CNAs detection methods’ performance.ResultsIn this work, we use a large-scale real dataset from CAGEKID consortium to evaluate total 12 typical CNAs detection methods. These methods are most widely used in cancer researches and always used as benchmark for the newly proposed CNAs detection methods. This large-scale dataset comprises of SNP array data on 94 samples and the whole genome sequencing data on 10 samples. Evaluations are comprehensively implemented in current scenarios of CNAs detection, which include that detect CNAs on SNP array data, on sequencing data with tumor and normal matched samples and on sequencing data with single tumor sample. Three SNP based methods are firstly ranked. Subsequently, the best SNP based method’s results are used as benchmark to compare six matched samples based methods and three single tumor sample based methods in terms of the preprocessing, recall rate, Jaccard index and segmentation characteristics.ConclusionsOur survey thoroughly reveals 12 typical methods’ superiority and inferiority. We explain why methods show specific characteristics from a methodological standpoint. Finally, we present the guiding principle for choosing one proper CNAs detection method under specific conditions. Some unsolved problems and expectations are also addressed for upcoming CNAs detection methods.

Highlights

  • Copy Number Variations is one kind of genomic structural variation defined as a gain or loss region in size over 1 kb

  • The difference between Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) and Copy number variations (CNVs) is that copy number alterations are changes in copy number that have arisen in somatic tissue and copy number variations originate from changes in copy number in germline cells

  • Precise Log R Ratio (LRR) baseline shift estimation is the basis of copy number alteration judgment [49]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Copy Number Variations (abbreviate it to CNVs) is one kind of genomic structural variation defined as a gain or loss region in size over 1 kb. Different from other molecules’ association with cancers [4,5,6], copy number change involves in the initiation and development of cancers in a way that copy numbers are different in an individual’s germline DNA and in the DNA of a clonal sub-population of cells Such copy number change is specially called as somatic CNAs (copy number alterations) [7, 8]. Limited by the scale of evaluation data, these different comparison works don’t reach a consensus and the researchers are still confused on how to choose one proper CNAs caller for their analysis It needs a more comprehensive evaluation of typical CNAs detection methods’ performance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call