Abstract

AbstractThe ice‐covered period on lakes in the northern hemisphere has often been neglected or assumed to have less importance relative to the open water season. However, recent studies challenge this convention, suggesting that the winter period is more dynamic than previously thought. In this review, we synthesize the current understanding of under‐ice carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) dynamics, highlighting the annual importance of CO2 and CH4 emissions from lakes at ice‐melt. We compiled data from 25 studies that showed that the ice‐melt period represents 17% and 27% of the annual CO2 and CH4 emissions, respectively. We also found evidence that the magnitude and type of emission (i.e., CO2 and CH4) varies with characteristics of lakes including geographic location, lake morphometry, and physicochemical conditions. The scarcity of winter and spring carbon data from northern lakes represents a major gap in our understanding of annual budgets in these lakes and calls for future research during this key period.

Highlights

  • The ice-covered period on lakes in the northern hemisphere has often been neglected or assumed to have less importance relative to the open water season

  • The winter period has traditionally been excluded from annual C and nutrient budgets, it is becoming clear that under-ice processes and subsequent ice-melt emissions play an important role in determining the amount and type (i.e., CO2 and CH4) of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted from northern lakes on an annual cycle (Striegl et al 2001; Karlsson et al 2013; Ducharme-Riel et al 2015; Denfeld et al 2016; Wik et al 2016)

  • External CO2 and CH4 imported from land directly contributes to internal lake GHGs, and this applies to the ice cover period as well

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ice-covered period on lakes in the northern hemisphere has often been neglected or assumed to have less importance relative to the open water season. The winter period has traditionally been excluded from annual C and nutrient budgets, it is becoming clear that under-ice processes and subsequent ice-melt emissions play an important role in determining the amount and type (i.e., CO2 and CH4) of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted from northern lakes on an annual cycle (Striegl et al 2001; Karlsson et al 2013; Ducharme-Riel et al 2015; Denfeld et al 2016; Wik et al 2016).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.