Abstract
A survey of operators of a bedside blood glucose monitoring (BGM) program at a tertiary health care institution was performed to identify potential outcome indicators for our quality assurance program. 170 surveys were randomly distributed to each nursing unit. The survey consisted of 20 questions on 4 pages. At the time of the survey, the BGM program consisted of 514 operators and 33 blood glucose meters on 17 inpatient nursing units servicing a total of 445 hospital beds. Seventy-eight percent of surveys were returned. Seventy-one percent of operators used the glucose meter at least once a week, 17% used it less than once a week, and 12% used it less than once a month. When asked how often they thought operators should perform BGM to ensure reliability, 65% stated "at least monthly," 8% said "bimonthly," and 27% said "3 to 4 times a year." In the previous 3 months, 59% of operators recalled "never having to repeat a BGM measurement with the glucose meter." 56% recalled "never having to confirm a BGM result by sending a venous sample to the central laboratory," 38% recalled "sending a venous sample once or twice;" 4% recalled "three or four times;" and 2% recalled "more than four times." Fifty-two percent recalled having to perform a stat analysis "less than once per month," 37% recalled "once or twice per month," and 11% recalled "once or twice per week." Through this survey we obtained information from our operators about the current functioning of our BGM program. Based on this information, we were able to develop a list of potential outcome indicators that we encourage health care institutions with BGM programs to consider incorporating in their quality assurance (QA) program.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.