Abstract
A cross-sectional survey to investigate the use of intra radicular posts in clinical practice was distributed to GDPs attending continuing professional development lectures and delegates of a specialist prosthodontic conference. Fifty-six (51%) GDP's and fifty-three (49%) conference delegates responded. Forty-five percent of GDP's exclusively used metal posts in comparison to 25% of the conference delegates. The findings of this study suggest there are no differences in the use of intra-radicular posts between GDPs and conference delegates. Formal post-graduate training does appear to have a limited influence over the selection of post materials.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
