Abstract

This study explored the sub-strategies Saudi English majors use most when consulting the dictionary. In particular, it looked at the aspects of the dictionary use strategy relevant to the dictionary itself rather than the lookup words (mainly purposes for consulting the dictionary, means of dictionary ownership and type of dictionary consulted). The participants were 90 English major students enrolled in an English undergraduate program at the Department of European Languages at King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. A survey questionnaire adapted from the literature was used to collect data for the study. The results showed that the learners’ strategic preferences were largely affected by the features they liked (e.g. free dictionaries, the ease of use and search as well as portability of tech-based digital dictionaries) or disliked (e.g. the difficulty of search and use in paper dictionaries as well as their heavy weight and high thickness) most about dictionaries. Thus, they preferred to either download dictionary apps to their phones from application stores or go online whenever they needed to consult a dictionary for a word. Moreover, in terms of dictionary types, learners favored the bilingual English-Arabic dictionary (language-wise), dictionary apps and online dictionaries (medium-wise) and the ordinary dictionary (content-wise). Also, they consulted the dictionary no more than five times a day and tended to look up more words when consulting tech-based (digital) dictionaries than when using paper dictionaries. Finally, they used their dictionaries mainly to understand new words while reading.

Highlights

  • Wilkins (1972: 111) duly notes that “without grammar very little can be conveyed, without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed”

  • The same procedure was done to find out the percentages of students who virtually made use of their dictionaries

  • To answer research questions (RQ2-RQ7B), we calculated the mean score for each of the seventy-three (73) dictionary sub-strategies identified across all strategy aspects included in the DUSQ1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wilkins (1972: 111) duly notes that “without grammar very little can be conveyed, without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed”. L2 learners feel that inadequate vocabulary is the reason for many problems they face in both receptive and productive language use (Nation, 1990). In this regard, research stresses that increasing recognition for the importance of explicit vocabulary training in L2 learning should be accompanied by a greater awareness of the dictionary’s potential (Scholfield, 1997; Folse, 2004). McAlpine and Myles (2003: 72) neatly point out where this potential mostly lies: Whether it is used electronically, online or in print form, its purpose is to help learners expand their vocabulary and increase their awareness of common grammar errors (Summers, 1988; Tang, 1997). An online dictionary of English phraseology that illustrates common collocations with sentence examples can help advanced learners to improve their writing skills in English and expand their passive and active vocabulary

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call