Abstract

Research has been scarce on health professionals' knowledge about guidelines regulating service dogs in a clinical setting. Gaining insight into health professionals'understanding of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations concerning service dogs is critical for navigating compliance and reducing risk. Misinformation about service dogs could influence decisions affecting policy and care, leading to poor treatment and suboptimal health outcomes for patients with service animals. To assess health professionals' knowledge about ADA regulations and beliefs about workplace protocols and training related to service dogs. The study used snowball sampling to distribute surveys to health professionals from around the United States. Initial outreach occurred using mailing lists, investigators' personal networks, and social media. The survey contained 24 items. True and false questions were used to test ADA knowledge and then coded as correct or incorrect. Most closed-end questions were measured on a 5-point Likertscale using frequencies and descriptive statistics. A one-wayanalysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to test whether variables, such as encounters to service dogs, affected knowledge of ADA requirements. The survey was completed by 441 health professionals from around the country. Most (234; 53.1%) worked in a hospital and came from a range of professional backgrounds (nurses, 155 [35.2%]; physicians, 71 [16.1%]). While nearly three-quarters (318 [73.1%]) of participants said their workplace had a policy on service animals, 113 (34.9%) of those said they were unfamiliar with the policy and 236 (54.5%) said they had not received adequate training on the topic. Most participants did not know basic ADA policy requirements related to service dogs. Only those who were extremely familiar with policy (F=4.613; p=0.001) and those who strongly agreed that they knew the differences between service dogs and other classes of animals (F=5.906; p=0.000) scored higher on the knowledge test than those who disagreed. Our results suggest that increased familiarity and training leads to higher knowledge about servicedogs and ADA policy. Health professionals need additional education on ADA service dog regulations andhospital policy in order to minimize risk and ensure patientswith service dogs receive optimal care.

Highlights

  • Context: Research has been scarce on health professionals’ knowledge about guidelines regulating service dogs in a clinical setting

  • Our results suggest that increased familiarity and training leads to higher knowledge about service dogs and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) policy

  • ADA knowledge was lower among participants who had not encountered service dogs, felt they had inadequate training, or said they were uncomfortable dealing with service dogs. Participants who said they were extremely familiar with their workplace’s policy and those who strongly agreed that they knew the difference between service animals and other classes of animals scored higher on the knowledge test than those who disagreed. These results suggest that increased of familiarity and training leads to higher knowledge levels about service dogs and ADA regulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Context: Research has been scarce on health professionals’ knowledge about guidelines regulating service dogs in a clinical setting. Gaining insight into health professionals’ understanding of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations concerning service dogs is critical for navigating compliance and reducing risk. Objectives: To assess health professionals’ knowledge about ADA regulations and beliefs about workplace protocols and training related to service dogs. Methods: The study used snowball sampling to distribute surveys to health professionals from around the United States. True and false questions were used to test ADA knowledge and coded as correct or incorrect. Most closed-end questions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale using frequencies and descriptive statistics. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to test whether variables, such as encounters to service dogs, affected knowledge of ADA requirements

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.