A survey of workload measurement systems: the occupational therapy manager's perspective.

Abstract

Interest in measuring workload for budget specific purposes has increased in recent years as health care managers are being forced to cope with the demands of cost containment and fiscal accountability. This paper reports on a survey of senior occupational therapy managers of Ontario facilities accredited by the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT). Respondents were surveyed on their experiences with, and attitudes toward, occupational therapy workload measurement systems and the ability of these systems to assist in management activities. The survey found that most departments were using the National Hospital Productivity Improvement Program (NHPIP) system. Seventy eight percent of managers indicated they were somewhat or very satisfied with the system, but 60% also indicated that it did not adequately meet all of their management needs. In terms of desirable features of a revised workload system, 87% of managers reported wanting a system based on diagnostic or case mix group recording. Client variables (91%), physical and psychosocial aspects of client care (89%) and therapist variables (85%) were also rated as important factors to address in developing new workload systems.