A survey of the surgical management of acute and chronic scapholunate instability

Abstract

Scapholunate instability is a challenging problem and controversy persists among hand surgeons with respect to treatment choice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern of practice among specialized hand surgeons in the management of both acute and chronic scapholunate instability. A mailed survey study was sent to the 1,628 members of the American and Canadian Societies for Surgery of the Hand. Hand surgeons were asked to complete a comprehensive management questionnaire that examined a surgeon's treatment algorithm in the clinical case of acute and chronic scapholunate instability. The algorithm included the choices of further investigation, timing of surgery, surgical approach, surgical procedure, fixation, and predicted outcome. Of the 468 hand surgeons who responded to the survey the vast majority elected to perform surgery when confronted with a case of scapholunate instability. Early surgical intervention within 6 weeks of injury using an open dorsal approach was favored in both acute and chronic cases. The preferred surgical procedure in the acute case was scapholunate repair combined with a capsulodesis followed by scapholunate ligament repair alone. Favored management of the chronic case included Blatt capsulodesis alone, capsulodesis combined with a scapholunate ligament repair, or scaphotrapezium-trapezoid arthrodesis. A majority of surgeons used K-wire fixation, especially of the scapholunate and scaphocapitate in both acute and chronic cases. This survey confirms a consensus for the early soft tissue surgical management of acute scapholunate instability using a scapholunate ligament repair with or without a capsulodesis. The management of chronic scapholunate instability is highly variable among respondents and the choice of either a soft tissue or bony procedure may depend to a large extent on intraoperative findings.