Abstract

BackgroundPlastic surgery training is undergoing major changes however there is paucity of data detailing the current state of training as perceived by plastic surgical trainees. Our aim was to determine the quality of training as perceived by the current trainee pool and their future plans.MethodsA 25-item anonymous survey with three discrete sections (demographics, quality of training, and post-graduate career plans) was developed and distributed to plastic surgery residents during the academic year 2013. With the confidence interval of 95% and margin of error of 10%, our target response rate was 87 responders.ResultsWe received a total of 114 respondents with all levels of Post Graduate Year in training represented. Upon comparison of residents with debt of <100,000 to residents with a debt of >250,000, those with higher debt were significantly less interested in fellowship training (p value 0.05) and were more likely to pursue private practice (p value <0.01). Disciplines within plastic surgery least offered as a separate rotation were microsurgery (45%) followed by aesthetic surgery (33%). 53.7% of the residents felt that they were least trained in aesthetic surgery followed by burn surgery 45.4%. Of note 56.4% intended to seek additional training after residency. Moreover residents with an average of 6.4 months of experience in an individual subspecialty were more likely to feel comfortable with that specialty.ConclusionsThis survey highlights the areas and subspecialties that deserve attention as perceived by the current trainee pool.

Highlights

  • Plastic surgery training is undergoing major changes there is paucity of data detailing the current state of training as perceived by plastic surgical trainees

  • The survey was electronically distributed to all plastic surgery training programs recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) during the 2013 calendar year

  • Demographics There were 114 responders to the survey giving us a survey response rate of 12.7%. 86% of the responses were obtained in the month of June, at the end of the academic cycle 2013, 14% responses were obtained from July through October 2013

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plastic surgery training is undergoing major changes there is paucity of data detailing the current state of training as perceived by plastic surgical trainees. Our aim was to determine the quality of training as perceived by the current trainee pool and their future plans. Training in plastic surgery is undergoing major changes including a transition from independent to integrated models of training with a parallel evolution in subspecialty training. The American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons describes the two pathways into plastic surgical training. Whereas training in the Integrated model requires 5 or 6 years of accredited residency under the authority and Hashmi et al BMC Res Notes (2017) 10:234 surgery residents perceive the current state of training and to delineate their future goals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call