Abstract

When the atmospheric diffusion of a material is described by the usual Guassian plume model, dry deposition of the contaminant onto the underlying surface is commonly accounted for by appropriately reducing the source strength, as originally proposed by Chamberlain. A more realistic model is developed which selectively depletes the Gaussian plume in the vicinity of the deposition surface rather than throughout the vertical extent of the plume as done in the source depletion model. This improved model is used to show that the source depletion model consistently overpredicts the surface air concentration and the deposition at downwind locations close to the source and, as a consequence, is biased in the opposite sense for locations far from the source. At all distances from the source, the source depletion model overestimates the total deposition between source and receptor and consequently underpredicts the amount of remaining airborne material. Quantitative comparisons are shown to aid the user in choosing, for his particular circumstances, between the less accurate source depletion model and the computationally more complex surface depletion model.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.