Abstract

The ostracod family Cylindroleberididae is based on the genus Cylindroleberis Brady, 1868, and has a complicated nomenclatural history. The type species of Cylindroleberis is Cypridina mariae Baird, 1850. Baird described only the carapace, which had been considered lost. Thus, there was no reference point for the concept C. mariae or the genus Cylindroleberis. Baird's material has now been found in the Natural History Museum, London, U.K., and is illustrated here. To clarify the taxonomic status of C. mariae and Cylindroleberis, specimens were obtained from near the type locality, and a supplementary description is presented. This includes description of appendages, particularly the first antenna and mandible, which contain important diagnostic characters. This supplementary description provides important information about C. mariae, allowing a revision of the genus Cylindroleberis, and establishing a framework for future biological research on this ostracod group.

Highlights

  • Cylindroleberidid ostracods are distinguished from other myodocopid families by their flat gills at the posterior of the body [1,2,3]

  • The Cylindroleberididae and Cylindroleberidinae are based on the genus Cylindroleberis Brady, 1868 [6]

  • Baird’s specimens were considered lost [9], the material is stored in the Natural History Museum, London, U.K

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cylindroleberidid ostracods are distinguished from other myodocopid families by their flat gills at the posterior of the body [1,2,3]. A cladistic analysis based on morphological and molecular characters suggests cylindroleberidids are a monophyletic clade within the Myodocopa [4]. The complicated taxonomic history and current species list of Cylindroleberididae was presented in Syme and Poore [5]. The Cylindroleberididae and Cylindroleberidinae are based on the genus Cylindroleberis Brady, 1868 [6]. The type species of Cylindroleberis is Cypridina mariae Baird, 1850 [7], subsequently designated by Sylvester-Bradley [8] despite the inadequacy of Baird’s description. Like many ostracod descriptions in the nineteenth century, Baird’s description was of the carapace only.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.