A subregion-based RadioFusionOmics model discriminates between grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma on multisequence MRI

Abstract

PurposeTo explore a subregion-based RadioFusionOmics (RFO) model for discrimination between adult-type grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma according to the 2021 WHO CNS5 classification.Methods329 patients (40 grade 4 astrocytomas and 289 glioblastomas) with histologic diagnosis was retrospectively collected from our local institution and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The volumes of interests (VOIs) were obtained from four multiparametric MRI sequences (T1WI, T1WI + C, T2WI, T2-FLAIR) using (1) manual segmentation of the non-enhanced tumor (nET), enhanced tumor (ET), and peritumoral edema (pTE), and (2) K-means clustering of four habitats (H1: high T1WI + C, high T2-FLAIR; (2) H2: high T1WI + C, low T2-FLAIR; (3) H3: low T1WI + C, high T2-FLAIR; and (4) H4: low T1WI + C, low T2-FLAIR). The optimal VOI and best MRI sequence combination were determined. The performance of the RFO model was evaluated using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and the best signatures were identified.ResultsThe two best VOIs were manual VOI3 (putative peritumoral edema) and clustering H34 (low T1WI + C, high T2-FLAIR (H3) combined with low T1WI + C and low T2-FLAIR (H4)). Features fused from four MRI sequences (Fseq1,2,3,4\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$${F}_{seq}^{\\mathrm{1,2},\\mathrm{3,4}}$$\\end{document}) outperformed those from either a single sequence or other sequence combinations. The RFO model that was trained using fused features Fseq1,2,3,4\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$${F}_{seq}^{\\mathrm{1,2},\\mathrm{3,4}}$$\\end{document} achieved the AUPRC of 0.972 (VOI3) and 0.976 (H34) in the primary cohort (p = 0.905), and 0.971 (VOI3) and 0.974 (H34) in the testing cohort (p = 0.402).ConclusionThe performance of subregions defined by clustering was comparable to that of subregions that were manually defined. Fusion of features from the edematous subregions of multiple MRI sequences by the RFO model resulted in differentiation between grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma.