Abstract

This study assessed the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and iridocorneal angle using a portable smart eye camera (SEC) compared to the conventional slit-lamp microscope and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). This retrospective case-control study included 170 eyes from 85 Japanese patients. The correlation between the ACD evaluations conducted with the SEC and conventional slit-lamp was high (r = 0.814). The correlation between the Van-Herick Plus grade obtained using two devices was also high (r = 0.919). A high kappa value was observed for the Van-Herick Plus grading (Kappa = 0.757). A moderate correlation was observed between the ACD measured using AS-OCT and the slit-lamp image acquired with the conventional slit-lamp microscope and SEC (r = 0.609 and 0.641). A strong correlation was observed between the trabecular-iris angle (TIA) measured using AS-OCT and Van-Herick Plus grade obtained with the conventional slit-lamp microscope and SEC (r = 0.702 and 0.764). Strong correlations of ACD evaluation and high kappa value of the Van-Herick Plus grading indicated the adequate subjective assessment function of the SEC. Moderate correlations between the ACD objective measurement and evaluation and strong correlation between the TIA and Van-Herick Plus grade suggested the good objective assessment function of the SEC. The SEC demonstrated adequate performance for ACD evaluation and angle estimation.

Highlights

  • A weighted kappa coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the Van-Herick Plus grade obtained with the conventional slit-lamp microscope and smart eye camera (SEC)

  • The correlation coefficient between the anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured with the conventional slit-lamp and SEC was high in the right, left, and both eyes (r = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.786–0.885; r = 0.792 95% CI: 0.696–0.860; and r = 0.814, 95% CI: 0.756–0.860; respectively; Table 2)

  • The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of ACD evaluation and anterior chamber angle estimation by the new slit-lamp SEC device

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Some types of portable slit-lamp microscopes exist, these instruments lack a recording function [5]. These instruments are basically disconnected from the internet to safeguard patients’ medical information. The AS-OCT device (which makes objective measurements) is unmovable, similar to the portability issue associated with the conventional slit-lamp microscopes [5]. No study has investigated the ACD evaluation and angle estimation function of the portable and recordable slit-lamp device. We evaluated the diagnostic function of the SEC by comparing the subjective grades obtained using conventional slit-lamp microscopy and objective measurement obtained using AS-OCT in this study

Ethics Approval
Study Design
Diagnostic Instruments and Slit-Lamp Examinations
Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
Statistical and Data Analysis
Patient Characteristics
Correlation between AS-OCT Findings and Conventional Slit-Lamp or SEC
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call