Abstract

BackgroundHospital to community pharmacy transfer of care medicines-related interventions for inpatients discharged home aim to improve continuity of care and patient outcomes. One such intervention has been provided for seven years within a region in England. This study reports upon the implementation process and fidelity of this intervention.MethodsThe process evaluation guidance issued by the Medical Research Council has informed this study. A logic model to describe the intervention and causal assumptions was developed from preliminary semi-structured interviews with project team members. Further semi-structured interviews were undertaken with intervention providers from hospital and community pharmacy, and with patient and public representatives. These aimed to investigate intervention implementation process and fidelity. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Consolidated Framework for Intervention Fidelity informed interview topic guides and underpinned the thematic framework analysis using a combined inductive and deductive approach.ResultsThemes provided information about intervention fidelity and implementation that were mapped across the sub processes of implementation: planning, execution, reflection and evaluation, and engagement. Interviewees described factors such as lack of training, awareness, clarity on the service specification, governance and monitoring and information and feedback which caused significant issues with the process of intervention implementation and suboptimal intervention fidelity.ConclusionsThis provides in-depth insight into the implementation process and fidelity of a ToC intervention, and the extant barriers and facilitators. The findings offer learning to inform the design and implementation of similar interventions, contribute to the evidence base about barriers and facilitators to such interventions and provides in-depth description of the implementation and mechanisms of impact which have the potential to influence clinical and economic outcome evaluation.

Highlights

  • The process evaluation guidance issued by the Medical Research Council has informed this study

  • The findings offer learning to inform the design and implementation of similar interventions, contribute to the evidence base about barriers and facilitators to such interventions and provides in-depth description of the implementation and mechanisms of impact which have the potential to influence clinical and economic outcome evaluation

  • A recent rapid review of hospital to community pharmacy transfer of care (ToC) interventions in England, was unable to report on statistically convincing clinical outcomes for patients receiving care from a community pharmacist post hospital discharge service

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A recent rapid review of hospital to community pharmacy transfer of care (ToC) interventions in England, was unable to report on statistically convincing clinical outcomes for patients receiving care from a community pharmacist post hospital discharge service This is due to the low quality design approaches adopted, small sample sizes and singularity of the study [1]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis evidences that when community pharmacists take an active role in a post-discharge intervention, there is an associated statistically significant 40% reduction in hospital 30-day readmission rates Authors report this cautiously given the heterogeneity in intervention design and evaluation, low intervention fidelity and generally high risk of bias associated with low quality study designs [4]. This study reports upon the implementation process and fidelity of this intervention

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call