Abstract

The monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of involuntary resettlement has been implemented for over 30 years since being introduced, achieving significant results in preventing resettlement risks and safeguarding the rights and interests of the persons affected (APs). However, the situation surrounding resettlement has changed significantly over these decades, as the interests of the APs have become more diverse and their social class differentiation has become more pronounced, implying that approaches regarding the governance of resettlement risks must be adjusted. Based on the experience of China, we intend to update the original model for M&E of involuntary resettlement, proposing that the two monitoring systems for risk-susceptible groups and the APs’ development should be set up separately in the monitoring model, and specific monitoring indicators defined within each system. In terms of the evaluation model, we introduce the meta-model of evaluation to strengthen the organic relationship among various evaluation units and enhance the overall capacity of the evaluation. Furthermore, the evaluation should be implemented in general resettlement, risk-susceptible groups resettlement and APs’ development.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of involuntary resettlement originated in China

  • Academic Editor: Juan ManuelThe monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of involuntary resettlement originated in China.As early as the early 1980s, China used its first loan from the World Bank (WB) to build the Datong River to Qinwangchuan Region Water Transferring Irrigation Project

  • What is the real performance of the use of the resettlement fund?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of involuntary resettlement originated in China. As early as the early 1980s, China used its first loan from the World Bank (WB) to build the Datong River to Qinwangchuan Region Water Transferring Irrigation Project. The WB, under pressure from international NGOs and the Congress of the United States, proposed M&E of involuntary resettlement in the development project to rehabilitate the persons affected (APs). Cernea to draft a policy paper on involuntary resettlement. Cernea prepared the document titled “Relocation of Involuntary

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call