Abstract
How to deal with the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice has always been a problem that modern countries under the rule of law must face. Because of its unique openness and universality, the media plays a positive role in supervising judicial justice. At the same time, if the media supervision lacks restriction or oversteps the boundary, it will also have a negative impact on judicial justice. How to balance the freedom of speech of the press and the open and fair trial of the judiciary, and how to resolve the contradiction between judicial activities and media supervision? Is there any legal regulation in the freedom of speech of the press? How to deal with the conflict between the judicial trial based on facts and the supervision based on law and the media based on morality? These problems are urgent to be solved in our current judicial practice. This article will start from the “Yu Huan case”, “Chongqing sister and brother fall case”, “Jiangsu Nantong elderly supermarket sudden death with eggs” and other cases occurred in recent years to seek the balance between the media and the judiciary to solve related problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
