A Study on the Cultural Differences Between Chinese and American Realistic Films: A Case Study of Dying to Survive and Dallas Buyers Club

Abstract

Dying to Survive and Dallas Buyers Club are two films centered around realistic themes, exploring the challenges faced by patients. Despite their shared focus on healthcare conditions, the films differ in their portrayal, thematic perspectives, and cultural implications due to varying production origins and cultural contexts. In terms of presentation, Dying to Survive employs humor and exaggeration against the backdrop of the drug trade, using satire and comedy to highlight Chinas healthcare system flaws and societal issues. Conversely, Dallas Buyers Club prioritizes realism, grounded in actual events and characters, shedding light on problems within the American healthcare setup. From a thematic standpoint, Dying to Survive probes Chinas medical system intricacies, legality of drug trade, and patients struggles. It tells a tale of ordinary individuals battling to survive and help others, critiquing and urging reform in Chinas medical landscape. On the other hand, Dallas Buyers Club delves into the US healthcare system, focusing on a protagonist who sells drugs illicitly for survival. The narrative confronts the mainstream medical establishment, evoking questions and introspection on Americas healthcare system. Culturally, Dying to Survive mirrors Chinese values, showcasing altruism and disdain for exorbitant drug costs. Meanwhile, Dallas Buyers Club mirrors American ideals of individual rights and freedoms, depicting one persons quest for survival and liberty, embodying core American values.