Abstract
In this study, differences between Japan and China with regard to smart business continuity management (SBCM) of buildings/facilities for near future cities are discussed. Approaches to the construction of smart cities in China have been making incredible progress, which are utterly different from those in Japan. The objective of this study is to identify their differences by taking Tokyo as an example. China is able to construct smart cities for which new technologies are employed, liberally under boldly conceived plans whereas adequate consideration must always be given to the risk reduction and prevention of disasters brought particularly by earthquakes in Japan. In this study, SBCM of buildings/facilities for near future cities have been discussed by taking Tokyo as an example.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
