Abstract
Online audits are the most important wellsprings of data about client feelings and are considered the columns on which the standing of an association is assembled. From a client's viewpoint, audit data is vital to settle on an appropriate choice with respect to an online buy. Surveys are for the most part thought to be a fair-minded assessment of a person's very own involvement in an item, however, the fundamental truth about these audits recounts an alternate story. Spammers abuse these audit stages unlawfully on account of impetuses engaged with composing counterfeit surveys, subsequently attempting to acquire a bit of leeway over contenders bringing about an unstable development of assessment spamming. This training is known as Opinion (Review) Spam, where spammers control and toxic substance surveys (i.e., making phony, untruthful, or misleading audits) for benefit or gain. It has become a typical practice for individuals to discover and to understand assessments/surveys on the Web for some reason. For instance, in the event that one needs to purchase an item, one commonly goes to a vendor or audit site (e.g., amazon.com) to peruse a few surveys of existing clients of the item. In the event that one sees numerous positive audits of the item, one is probably going to purchase the item. Notwithstanding, in the event that one sees many negative surveys, he/she will in all probability pick another item. Positive suppositions can bring about huge monetary benefits and additionally popularities for associations and people. This, sadly, offers great motivating forces for input spam. Most of the momentum research has zeroed in on regulated learning strategies, which require named information, a shortage with regards to online survey spam. Examination of techniques for Big Data is of revenue, since there are a huge number of online audits, with a lot seriously being produced every day. Until now, we have not discovered any papers that review the impacts of Big Data examination for survey spam identification. The essential objective of this paper is to give a solid and far-reaching similar investigation of flow research on identifying audit spam utilizing different AI procedures and to devise a strategy for directing further examination.
Highlights
In recent years, the overall Web has drastically changed the manner in which individuals convey and share their conclusions internationally
We have surveyed most of the existing literature regarding opinion spam detection that uses machine learning and natural language processing
The study has reviewed research work done in 3 different categories of detection methods, Review spam detection, Spam user detection, and Spammer group detection using supervised, unsupervised or semi-supervised learning
Summary
M. Tripathi (2021) A Study on Opinion Spamming: Fake Consumer Review Detection. Journal of Informatics Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vol 02, Iss. 02, S.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Informatics Electrical and Electronics Engineering (JIEEE)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.