Abstract
In order to investigate the difference between the hold-time effect in push-pull low-cycle fatigue and that in torsional one, both types of strain controlled fatigue tests of SUS 316 stainless steel were performed at 600°C with or without hold-time. Significant difference between the push-pull and torsional fatigue test data on the basis of equivalent total strain range of Mises' type was not observed in terms of number of cycles to failure, number of cycles to crack initiation and crack propagation rate. More precisely speaking, however, the push-pull test had a larger hold-time effect on the failure life and on the crack behaviors than the torsional test in lower strain range. That is, slower crack propagation rate was observed in the push-pull test without hold-time than in torsional one, but crack propagation was observed in the push-pull test with hold-time. This crack behavior was discussed from the influence of stress triaxiality near the crack tip on the crack propagation rate and also from the effect of hydrostatic stress.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
