Abstract

Background: Excision with lay open method and excision with primary closure (simple closure, z-plasty, limberg flaps are both radical methods for treating pilonidal sinus. The ideal operation should be simple and should not require a prolonged stay, have low recurrence, failure rate and post-operative complication. Aim& Objective: The main objective of the present study to compared different techniques for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Methodology: It was a cross sectional study. The materials for this study was taken from the patient admitted to Owaisi hospital from Jan 2013-Dec 2014 (2yr period) Twenty eight patients with pilonidal sinus who were admitted to Owaisi hospital Results: In the present study, 15 out of 28 cases were treated by excision and lay open method. The mortality was nil, but the recurrence was 1 and 2 failures were noticed (totally 22.6% failure) in terms of morbidity. Patients abstained from work till the wound healed i.e. 44-68 days(average 49.5 days).The remaining 13 cases were operated by excision and primary closure (simple closure, z-plasty, limberg flap method) out of which 8 cases were treated with z-plasty and 2 cases with simple primary closure and 3 cases with limberg flap method. The mortality was nil, the recurrence rate and post-operative complications were nil and all patients returned to work early within 7 days. Conclusion: Finally we concluded that all cases where closure is possible should be treated with different closure techniques (simple closure, z-plasty, limberg flap). Deep gluteal cleft is flattened with z-plasty and limberg flap technique. Hence the suction effect is obliterated. All predisposing factors are countered by flap technique hence flap techniques are ideal for treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call