Abstract
This article compares the systems of maintenance on or after divorce in Russia and China. Admittedly, we think that a recent amendment to the Marriage Law of China 2001 is significant in solving the practical problem of most divorced women who have no home in which to live. However, through this comparison, we find there are still some defects in the financial assistance system on divorce in China. First, the conditions under which financial assistance is awarded are too restrictive; second, there are no factors that a judge must consider when determining the amount of financial assistance; third, enforcement measures are inadequate. Finally, there is no statutory provision under which the financial assistance is exempted, limited, adjusted or terminated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
