Abstract

In this work, we report the synthesis of Cu, Pt and Pd doped SnO2 powders and a comparative study of their CO gas sensing performance. Dopants were incorporated into SnO2 nanostructures using chemical and impregnation methods by using urea and ammonia as precipitation agents. The synthesized samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The presence of dopants within the SnO2 nanostructures was evidenced from the HR-TEM results. Powders doped utilizing chemical methods with urea as precipitation agent presented higher sensing responses compared to the other forms, which is due to the formation of uniform and homogeneous particles resulting from the temperature-assisted synthesis. The particle sizes of doped SnO2 nanostructures were in the range of 40–100 nm. An enhanced sensing response around 1783 was achieved with Cu-doped SnO2 when compared with two other dopants i.e., Pt (1200) and Pd:SnO2 (502). The high sensing response of Cu:SnO2 is due to formation of CuO and its excellent association and dissociation with adsorbed atmospheric oxygen in the presence of CO at the sensor operation temperature, which results in high conductance. Cu:SnO2 may thus be an alternative and cost effective sensor for industrial applications.

Highlights

  • Gas leak detection is a constructive testing methid for dangerous combustible gases [1]

  • scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and and which is in consistent with our results reported in Figures 12 and 13

  • A shift in the (110) SnO2 plane confirms the incorporation of dopants ionic radii of the dopants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gas leak detection is a constructive testing methid for dangerous combustible gases [1]. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a toxic hazardous industrial gas produced from the incomplete burning of all carbon-based fuels. Different kinds of materials including metal oxide semiconductors (MOSs) are employed for detecting CO [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Among the available MOS materials, SnO2 is usually considered to be one of the best candidates for developing gas sensors due to its relatively low cost of production and adequate oxygen vacancies [10,11]. Available SnO2 gas sensors are mainly in the form of thick or thin films or pellets [12,13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call