Abstract

Many guidelines for cryoprecipitate utilization have been published, yet there is little evidence that these guidelines are being followed. A retrospective study was conducted to assess the appropriateness of cryoprecipitate utilization, based on pre-implemented guidelines over a four years period at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Eighty-five patients who received 705 units cryoprecipitate were included. Transfusion was assessed according to the predetermined appropriateness criteria. Cryoprecipitate was used inappropriately in 48.1% of cases. Transfusion was for the following appropriate indications: hypofibrinogenemia (n = 20), factor deficiency (n = 8), management of massive transfusion (n = 8), postpartum bleed and for correction of uremic bleeding. Most appropriate cryoprecipitate usage occurred when there was secondary hypofibrinogenemia with active bleeding (19.9%). Cryoprecipitate was misused in almost half of the patients in the study. The most common inappropriate medical indication was to correct uremic bleed, while the most common surgical indication was for correction of surgical bleeding in the absence of a specific factor deficiency (22.5%). Internal audit could help identify the pattern of misuse. Education among the medical community can help improve cryoprecipitate utilization.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.