Abstract
يدرس هذا البحث ظاهرة التداخل النصي intertextuality على وجه العموم وفي الكتابات الصحفية بصورة خاصة. تحاول هذه الدراسة أن تبين طبيعة هذه الظاهرة والسر وراء الاهتمام الواسع بها . تبدا الدراسة بمقدمة بسيطة كتمهيد للموضوع ثم بتقديم بعض التعاريف والآراء لمختلف اللغويين من اجل توضيح طبيعة الموضوع . تم ايضاً استعراض اهم انواع وابعاد التداخل النصي لينتهي الموضوع بتحليل نماذج صحفية محددة والخروج بمجموعة من الاستنتاجات المناسبة.
Highlights
Even with a single text, Wales (1989:259-60) says, there can be, as it were, a continual dialogue between the text given and other texts / utterances that exist outside it, literary and non-literary, either within that period of composition or in previous centuries
Fairclough returns to display a French discourse analysis idea saying that the distinction between intertextual relations of texts to specific other texts and intertextual relations of texts to conventions is linked to another distinction and that is manifest as opposed to constitutive intertextuality
Recognizing what has been written earlier about intertextuality the following points are arrived at : 1. Linguists and theorists who are concerned with the matter almost agree that no text is free form other previous texts
Summary
Even with a single text, Wales (1989:259-60) says, there can be, as it were, a continual dialogue between the text given and other texts / utterances that exist outside it, literary and non-literary , either within that period of composition or in previous centuries. It is believed that no text is free from other texts. In the same direction Worton et al (1990:2) believe that the term intertextuality dates from the 1960s the phenomenon in some form is at least as old as recorded-human society. We can find theories of intertextuality wherever there has been discourse about texts- both because thinkers were aware of intertextuality relations and because our knowledge of the theory makes us, as readers, keen to re-read our source text in that light. A text is a transformation of another, a common way that intertextuality works. Intertextuality should not be limited only to the study of literary texts or other types of texts, political texts for example, but the phenomenon can be realized in every – day life speech , i.e. in every day communication in a way or another. Whenever intertextuality is felt names as Kristeva (late 1960s) , Bakhtin and Fairclough should be remembered
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
