A Study of Evaluation Mechanism through the Experience of French and Taiwan’s Innovation Strategies

Ming-Ling Yang

doi:10.29333/ejmste/86060

Abstract

When a science park or a technology park react to a transformation in the world, it becomes important to determine how to eliminate components with poor performance that have not contributed to the country’s overall research and development targets. The theory and goal of competitiveness clusters and technology parks in France is similar. The territory of the Technology Park is a type of organization with a structure that can be re-organized, just as the concept of Fractal Theory, to become diversified into an organization through re-organization. This study uses the Fuzzy Delphi method to investigate France and Taiwan’s innovation strategies by analysing the degree of recognition of park evaluation items in an expert questionnaire as a preliminary study of park evaluation in developing Science Parks in Taiwan.

Highlights

The French science and technology strategy is characterized by strategic task-orientation, and it follows the Colbertist Model (Yang & Hsieh, 2016), namely that government intervention in economic development occurs through public enterprise, technological research institutions, and laws and regulations
The Hsinchu Science Park has been an industrial park under state-led planning with various economic incentives, including tax breaks and other support (Hsieh, Chou, Chen, & Hou, 2014)
This study investigates France and Taiwan’s innovation strategies using the Fuzzy Delphi method in an analysis of the degree of recognition of the park evaluation items in the expert questionnaire as a preliminary study of park evaluation mechanisms to develop Science Parks in Taiwan

Summary

Introduction

The French science and technology strategy is characterized by strategic task-orientation, and it follows the Colbertist Model (Yang & Hsieh, 2016), namely that government intervention in economic development occurs through public enterprise, technological research institutions, and laws and regulations. France adopted several directions of to implement reforms: (1) improving education; (2) revitalizing industry to protect the health of the national economy and ease the financial burden of enterprises; (3) promote the technology transformation of scientific and technological achievements through national legislation, (4) break down of the barriers between public and private research; (5) expand the construction of a technology transformation services platform; (6) improve the science and technology evaluation system This discussion will analyze the use of policy tools in both countries through a literature review and development process for the two parks, and will conclude with a comprehensive comparison. The Fuzzy Delphi method was used to organize the experts’ terms and explanations, as proposed by Ishikawa (1993)

Objectives

Results

Conclusion