Abstract

개별화교육계획의 구성요소 중 하나인 평가계획은 목적과 목표의 성취를 판단하기 위한 체계적인 자료수집과 분석이 요구되는 역동적인 과정이다. 본 연구에서는 경기, 충청 지역의 교육기관과 보육기관을 중심으로 특수교육대상 유아를 위한 개별화교육계획을 수집하였고 총 50부에 대해 평가계획을 분석하여 그 실태를 알아보았다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 특수교육대상 유아를 위한 IEP는 목적과 목표의 개수가 지나치게 많았고 보육기관이 교육기관보다 유의미하게 많았다. 둘째, 목표에 대한 수행기준은 대부분 제시 하였으나 성취기준은 거의 제시하지 않았다. 셋째, 평가자는 거의 제시하지 않았으며, 평가 주기의 제시는 매우 낮은 수준이며, 평가 주기를 명시한 경우 월 간격의 평가 주기가 가장 많았다. 넷째, 제시된 평가 방법은 관찰, 포트폴리오 순으로 제시되었으나 평가방법을 제시하지 않은 경우도 많았다. 연구 결과에 따른 논의와 과제를 제시하였다.The purpose of the present study is to investigate the current realities 1) if the Individualized Education Program(IEP) goals and objectives are measurable and 2) progress monitoring plan of the IEPs for young children with special needs both in the early childhood education settings and daycare settings. The subjects of the study were IEPs for young children special needs from the early childhood education setting and daycare setting. The results of this study were as follows. First, the number of goals and objectives of the IEPs were significantly greater from the daycare settings than the early childhood education settings. Second, the mastery criteria were higher than the retention criteria in the IEP objectives both from the early childhood education settings and the daycare settings. Third, only few IEPs presented assessor and time interval for progress monitoring, monthly monitoring was higher among the IEPs that presented timeline for progress monitoring. Finally, among the methods for progress monitoring presented in the IEPs, observation and portfolio were used most. However, there were many IEPs that did not present which method would be used for progress monitoring.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.