A Study of Computer-Assisted Tomography

Abstract

One hundred twenty-two patients with surgically confirmed pathology consisting of either herniated lumbar disc, spinal stenosis, or both were included in this investigation. For each of these patients, preoperative metrizamide myelography and computerized tomography were performed. Each myelogram and CT scan was read blindly so that the neuroradiologist interpreting the study had no knowledge of the patient's surgical pathology, clinical examination, nor any knowledge of the interpretation of the other preoperative test. A painstaking attempt was made to describe precisely both the exact nature of the preoperative myelogram and CT scan interpretations. The correlations between the preoperative interpretation of each test and the observed surgical findings then were analyzed statistically. Based upon this analysis, myelography was found to be more accurate than computed tomography in the diagnosis of herniated lumbar disc (83% vs. 72%). In the diagnosis of spinal stenosis, myelography was slightly more accurate than computed tomography (93% vs. 89%). Based upon the results of this study, the authors conclude that metrizamide myelography is more accurate than computed tomography in the diagnosis of both herniated lumbar disc and spinal stenosis and remains the diagnostic study of choice for these conditions. Furthermore, metrizamide myelography gives the added advantage of visualizing the thoracolumbar junction and, thus, affords the opportunity to diagnose occult spinal tumors.