Abstract
A survey of radiographic technique and estimated entrance surface dose has been carried out for 364 chest radiographs performed with mobile X-ray equipment in the Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) and 30 wards at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Data for these two types of location were compared, as were those for two film/screen systems used on the wards. Image quality assessments were made on sets of radiographs for two patients. Entrance skin doses for chest radiographs performed in the ITU were 50% greater than on the wards with the same film/screen system. The main technique difference was the use of shorter focus-to-skin distances (FSDs) in ITU. Doses with the Kodak Insight system were 20% higher than those using Du Pont Quanta III in similar locations. No correlation was found between image quality and entrance surface dose (ESD). Results from the survey were used to recommend exposure factors for shorter FSDs. A follow-up study revealed a 35-45% reduction in ESD for Kodak Insight and a 20% reduction for Quanta III.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
