Abstract

Manufactured nanomaterials (NMs) are increasingly used in a wide range of industrial applications leading to a constant increase in the market size of nano-enabled products. The increased production and use of NMs are raising concerns among different stakeholder groups with regard to their effects on human and environmental health. Currently, nanosafety hazard assessment is still widely performed using in vivo (animal) models, however the development of robust and reg­ulatory relevant strategies is required to prioritize and/or reduce animal testing. An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) is a structured representation of biological events that start from a molecular initiating event (MIE) leading to an adverse outcome (AO) through a series of key events (KEs). The AOP framework offers great advancement to risk assessment and regulatory safety assessments. While AOPs for chemicals have been more frequently reported, the AOP collection for NMs is limited. By using existing AOPs, we aimed to generate simple and testable strategies to predict if a given NM has the potential to induce a MIE leading to an AO through a series of KEs. Firstly, we identified potential MIEs or initial KEs reported for NMs in the literature. Then, we searched the identified MIE or initial KEs as keywords in the AOP-Wiki to find associated AOPs. Finally, using two case studies, we demonstrate how in vitro strategies can be used to test the identified MIE/KEs.

Highlights

  • These Performance Standards (PS) include the following sets of information: (i) Essential Test Method Components that serve to evaluate the structural, mechanistic and procedural similarity of a new similar or modified proposed test method, (ii) a list of 20 Reference Chemicals to be used for validating new or modified test methods and (iii) defined target values of reproducibility and predictive capacity that need to be met by proposed test methods in order to be considered similar to the validated reference methods

  • The containment properties of the RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RhE) model should prevent the passage of test chemical around the stratum corneum to the viable tissue, which would lead to poor modelling of skin exposure

  • The RhE model should only be used if the developer/supplier demonstrates that each batch of the RhE model used meets defined production release criteria, amongst which those for viability, barrier function and morphology are the most relevant

Read more

Summary

JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED SIMILAR OR MODIFIED IN VITRO RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RhE) TEST METHODS FOR SKIN IRRITATION TESTING AS DESCRIBED IN TG 439. Complete document available on OLIS in its original format This document and any map included are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area

About the OECD
INTRODUCTION
ESSENTIAL TEST METHOD COMPONENTS
General conditions
Functional conditions
Barrier function
Application of the Test Chemical and Control Substances
Cell Viability Measurements
Acceptability Criteria
Interpretation of Results and Prediction Model
MINIMUM LIST OF REFERENCE CHEMICALS
Liquid Solid Liquid Liquid Liquid Solid Liquid
DEFINED RELIABILITY AND PREDICTIVE CAPACITY VALUES
Predictive capacity
Findings
Study Acceptance Criteria
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call