Abstract
In Damons v City of Cape Town ([2022] ZACC 13) (CC judgment), the Constitutional Court (CC) had to deal with the issue of a person living with a disability who was injured in training. The minority judgment by Pillay AJ takes a socio-legal approach to the issue as it dives deep into how Mr Damons was injured and the responsibility of the employer to ensure that Mr Damons was reasonably accommodated. On the other hand, the decision of the majority by Majiedt J takes a formal legal approach in that it critiques the minority judgment from the perspective of the pleadings. This case note engages in a deep discussion of the matter, spanning the arbitration, Labour Court (LC), Labour Appeal Court (LAC) and both of the judgments of the CC. This case note engages in a discussion of the two judgments of the CC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.