Abstract

Brain rhythms have been proposed to facilitate brain function, with an especially important role attributed to the phase of low-frequency rhythms. Understanding the role of phase in neural function requires interventions that perturb neural activity at a target phase, necessitating estimation of phase in real-time. Current methods for real-time phase estimation rely on bandpass filtering, which assumes narrowband signals and couples the signal and noise in the phase estimate, adding noise to the phase and impairing detections of relationships between phase and behavior. To address this, we propose a state space phase estimator for real-time tracking of phase. By tracking the analytic signal as a latent state, this framework avoids the requirement of bandpass filtering, separately models the signal and the noise, accounts for rhythmic confounds, and provides credible intervals for the phase estimate. We demonstrate in simulations that the state space phase estimator outperforms current state-of-the-art real-time methods in the contexts of common confounds such as broadband rhythms, phase resets, and co-occurring rhythms. Finally, we show applications of this approach to in vivo data. The method is available as a ready-to-use plug-in for the Open Ephys acquisition system, making it widely available for use in experiments.

Highlights

  • Rhythms, consistently periodic voltage fluctuations, are an ubiquitous phenomenon observed in brain electrophysiology across scales and species

  • Our work demonstrates that the State Space Phase Estimate (SSPE) method improves the ability to track phase accurately, in realtime, across a diverse set of contexts encountered in data

  • We first examine in simulations the viability of different causal phase estimation algorithms, and how these existing methods compare to the proposed method - the state space phase estimator (SSPE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Consistently periodic voltage fluctuations, are an ubiquitous phenomenon observed in brain electrophysiology across scales and species. A prominent feature of rhythms proposed as relevant for neural processing is the phase. Phase has been proposed to coordinate neural spiking locally and potentially, through coherent networks, even globally (Fries, 2015; Maris et al, 2016). The phase of slow rhythms (3-15 Hz) has shown relationships to dynamics in perception (Busch et al, 2009; Gaillard et al, 2020; Gregoriou et al, 2009; Helfrich et al, 2018). Cross-regional, low frequency phase synchrony is consistently observed as a correlate of top-down executive control (Widge et al, 2019). Most work examining the importance of phase for neural dynamics and behavior has been correlative in nature. To better understand the functional relevance of the phase of a rhythm requires an ability to monitor and perturb phase relationships in real-time

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call