Abstract
James Cone can be difficult for any reader, but for White Christians he can be exceedingly difficult. Often White readers have a problem understanding both his agenda and the rhetorical arguments he uses. This article examines Cone within his context, seeking to help White readers better understand Cone’s agenda and his very prominent persona, while also suggesting ways that Cone might inform and help White theologians, pastors, and laypeople better understand themselves and their own theological traditions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
