Abstract

Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) provide a viable option to decarbonise global aviation. Unlike conventional jet-fuel, SAFs can be produced in several production pathways making their selection a complex multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with conflicting objectives. In this paper, we propose a multicriteria based framework for evaluating SAF production pathways, which is a sequential decision-making process with feedback adjustment mechanisms. Given the early stage of SAF technologies' development and the scarcity of data on such technologies, in this research, we involved a variety of aviation industry stakeholders to assist with data and preference gathering. Our MCDM framework is designed to be generic to provide flexibilities to potential users in choosing the appropriate implementation decisions for the relevant stakeholders. The strength of the proposed framework lays in its flexibility to accommodate various stakeholders' subjective judgements, choice of ranking method, and robustness of results. We used our MCDM framework within a stakeholders’ participatory approach to rank order 11 SAF production pathways against 24 criteria grouped under social, environmental, economic, and technical impact categories. Our analysis revealed that the environmental and the economic impact categories are the most important ones followed by the technical and the social criteria; the gasification/Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) based production processes are preferred over fermentation and oil-based ones; and waste gases are the preferred feedstock along with wood-residue. These findings provide decision-makers with guidelines on the selection of SAF production pathways.

Highlights

  • Commercial aviation has brought global connectivity and prosperity

  • We propose an multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) based framework to assess the relative performance of Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) production pathways under multiple criteria, and devise a multi-criteria ranking to assist a variety of aviation industry stakeholders to make informed decisions

  • SAF can be pro­ duced in several ways making the selection of a particular pathway a complex strategic decision

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Commercial aviation has brought global connectivity and prosperity. Governments are expected to gain U.S $129 billion in tax revenues and 70 million global supply chain jobs in 2019 (IATA, 2019a). GHG are not limited to carbon dioxide (CO2), it is the relative contribution of CO2 (~53%) to the GHG effect that makes it important. Though this emission level merely corresponds to 2%–2.6% share of annual global CO2 emissions (ICAO, 2016), it is significantly worse than other emission sources as they are emitted at a higher altitude making for a far greater adverse environmental impact (Kivits et al, 2010). The aviation industry’s contribution to global fossil fuel CO2 emissions are expected to reach 4.6–20.2% by 2050 (Staples et al, 2018)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call