Abstract

vidence for policy-informed decision-making, budgeting and programming. National evaluation systems (NESs) are being set up across Africa, together with the processes and other monitoring and evaluation (ME) infrastructure for efficient and effective functioning.Objectives: This article seeks to document comparative developments in the growth of systems in Anglophone African countries, and provide an understanding of these systems for capacity-development interventions in these countries. It also aims to contribute to the public debate on the development of national ME systems, institutionalisation of evaluation, and use of ME evidence in the larger African context.Methods: This article uses four key dimensions as the conceptual framework of a national monitoring and evaluation system, including monitoring and evaluation systems in the executive; the functioning of parliamentary ME systems; professionalisation of evaluation and existence of an enabling environment. A questionnaire was used to collect information based on the key dimensions from government and non-governmental personnel. The Mo Ibrahim index of 2018 was used to collect information on enabling environment.Results: Findings indicate that all systems have stakeholders with different roles and contexts and are designed according to the state architecture, prevailing resources and capacities.Conclusions: This article concludes that the findings can be used as different entry points for developing and strengthening ME capacities in countries studied.

Highlights

  • The rapid growth of National Evaluation Systems (NESs) in Africa has created a range of questions with respect to how these systems are best positioned within public sector bureaucracies; how they align to existing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) related functions; what policy environment underpins them, and how their effectiveness will be assessed

  • National evaluation systems have developed in advanced economies since the 1980s; in Latin America since the 1990s and in Africa from 2007, mainly in Benin, Uganda and South Africa in 2011, whilst in Ghana, Kenya, Rwanda and Zambia there are M&E systems

  • In 2018, a second iteration of tracking the M&E systems in Anglophone Africa was undertaken, focusing on the six Anglophone countries that are either Twende Mbele members or countries in which the CLEAR-AA carried out diagnostic studies in 2018, namely Ghana, Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia

Read more

Summary

Background

The need to demonstrate development results has prompted governments across Africa to build systems to generate, supply and use evaluative evidence for policy-informed decision-making, budgeting and programming. National evaluation systems (NESs) are being set up across Africa, together with the processes and other monitoring and evaluation (M&E) infrastructure for efficient and effective functioning

Objectives
Methods
Conclusions
Introduction and purpose
Enabling environment
Methodology
Findings
Rwanda
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.