Abstract

A dominant theory of working memory (WM), referred to as the persistent activity hypothesis, holds that recurrently connected neural networks, presumably located in the prefrontal cortex, encode and maintain WM memory items through sustained elevated activity. Reexamination of experimental data has shown that prefrontal cortex activity in single units during delay periods is much more variable than predicted by such a theory and associated computational models. Alternative models of WM maintenance based on synaptic plasticity, such as short-term nonassociative (non-Hebbian) synaptic facilitation, have been suggested but cannot account for encoding of novel associations. Here we test the hypothesis that a recently identified fast-expressing form of Hebbian synaptic plasticity (associative short-term potentiation) is a possible mechanism for WM encoding and maintenance. Our simulations using a spiking neural network model of cortex reproduce a range of cognitive memory effects in the classical multi-item WM task of encoding and immediate free recall of word lists. Memory reactivation in the model occurs in discrete oscillatory bursts rather than as sustained activity. We relate dynamic network activity as well as key synaptic characteristics to electrophysiological measurements. Our findings support the hypothesis that fast Hebbian short-term potentiation is a key WM mechanism. <b>SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT</b> Working memory (WM) is a key component of cognition. Hypotheses about the neural mechanism behind WM are currently under revision. Reflecting recent findings of fast Hebbian synaptic plasticity in cortex, we test whether a cortical spiking neural network model with such a mechanism can learn a multi-item WM task (word list learning). We show that our model can reproduce human cognitive phenomena and achieve comparable memory performance in both free and cued recall while being simultaneously compatible with experimental data on structure, connectivity, and neurophysiology of the underlying cortical tissue. These findings are directly relevant to the ongoing paradigm shift in the WM field.

Highlights

  • Working memory (WM) is a key component of cognition

  • We build on a previously published such model, which demonstrated how facilitation-based reactivations in a cortical microcircuit with fast, basket-cell mediated feedback-inhibition can successfully reproduce brief, narrow ␥-band bursts, linked to multi-item memory activity in nonhuman primate prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Lundqvist et al, 2011, 2016). We further extended this model with fast Hebbian synaptic plasticity in line with previous work on a nonspiking network model of WM (Sandberg et al, 2003)

  • A new and important aspect of such a demonstration is to ask, how a persistent activity signal could be understood to be simultaneously compatible with recent critical reviews of the persistent activity hypothesis (Shafi et al, 2007; Sreenivasan et al, 2014; Stokes, 2015) and experimental findings of discrete oscillatory bursts, linked to WM activity in nonhuman primate PFC recordings (Lundqvist et al, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Working memory (WM) is a key component of cognition. It maintains information over seconds and minutes in a form thatReceived June 21, 2016; revised Oct. 5, 2016; accepted Oct. 19, 2016. Working memory (WM) is a key component of cognition. It maintains information over seconds and minutes in a form that. The membrane voltage changes through incoming currents over the membrane capacitance Cm. A leak reversal potential EL drives a leak current through the conductance gL, and an upstroke slope factor ⌬T determines the sharpness of the spike threshold Vt. Spikes are followed by a reset to Vr. Each spike increments the adaptation current by b, which decays with time constant ␶w. In addition to external input Iext (see Stimulation protocol), neurons receive a number of different synaptic currents from other presynaptic neurons in the network (AMPA, NMDA, and GABA), which are summed at the membrane according to the following:

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call