Abstract

The Imagination is not morally neutral; images mould our moral visions. They can illuminate, but they can also mislead. Yet image‐making is innate to perception. This study analyses how master metaphors shape the consciousness of the major characters and lead to inadequate cognition. Aesthetically Bruno's Dream is controlled by a spectrum of image‐making: the two central characters, Bruno Greensleave, the materialist, and Lisa Watkins, the mystic, weave metaphors at the opposite end of a spectrum: Bruno perceives self and God in total concretion, Lisa signifies them in total silence. In light of this spectrum, the study examines three aspects of the novel: it analyses the function of mise‐en‐abyme. It introduces a new reading of Nigel. He is a self‐mythologizing enchanter, who believes he is the avatar of shiva. The study also explicates the subversive roles of the spiders and the river Thames. Bruno's Dream gauges the characters’spiritual journeys by their ability to efface images, and by their ability to understand death, i e., imageless perception.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.