Abstract

The search for traits that make alien species invasive has mostly concentrated on comparing successful invaders and different comparison groups with respect to average trait values. By contrast, little attention has been paid to trait variability among invaders. Here, we combine an analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive species with a comparison of multidimensional trait variability within these two species groups. We collected data on biological and distributional traits for 1402 species of the native, non-woody vascular plant flora of Austria. We then compared the subsets of species recorded and not recorded as invasive aliens anywhere in the world, respectively, first, with respect to the sampled traits using univariate and multiple regression models; and, second, with respect to their multidimensional trait diversity by calculating functional richness and dispersion metrics. Attributes related to competitiveness (strategy type, nitrogen indicator value), habitat use (agricultural and ruderal habitats, occurrence under the montane belt), and propagule pressure (frequency) were most closely associated with invasiveness. However, even the best multiple model, including interactions, only explained a moderate fraction of the differences in invasive success. In addition, multidimensional variability in trait space was even larger among invasive than among non-invasive species. This pronounced variability suggests that invasive success has a considerable idiosyncratic component and is probably highly context specific. We conclude that basing risk assessment protocols on species trait profiles will probably face hardly reducible uncertainties.

Highlights

  • The search for traits which define successful invaders is one of the fundamental issues in invasion biology [1,2,3]

  • Our analysis focused on the native, non-woody terrestrial vascular plant flora of Austria because knowledge about traits and habitat affiliation of this source area is consistent and relatively complete

  • Summarizing traits into groups and calculating multiple models demonstrated that the trait group ‘reproduction’ explained invasiveness worst, while the trait groups ‘habitat use’ and ‘competitiveness’ had highest predictive abilities (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The search for traits which define successful invaders is one of the fundamental issues in invasion biology [1,2,3]. Identifying such traits is of scientific interest but would facilitate predictions about which species might cause ecological or socio-economic problems upon introduction and help to improve proactive management. Researchers have used various approaches to detect such ‘invasion traits’, or trait values, like the comparison of invasive and/or non-invasive alien species with native ones in the introduced ranges, or the PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155547. The ability of these traits to discriminate invasive from non-invasive species was mostly moderate at best, and an undisputed set of attributes that clearly distinguish invaders has not yet emerged (e.g. [11])

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call