Abstract

BackgroundThe use of motion tracking has been proved to provide an objective assessment in surgical skills training. Current systems, however, require the use of additional equipment or specialised laparoscopic instruments and cameras to extract the data. The aim of this study was to determine the possibility of using a software-based solution to extract the data.Methods6 expert and 23 novice participants performed a basic laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure in the operating room. The recorded videos were analysed using Kinovea 0.8.15 and the following parameters calculated the path length, average instrument movement and number of sudden or extreme movements.ResultsThe analysed data showed that experts had significantly shorter path length (median 127 cm vs. 187 cm, p = 0.01), smaller average movements (median 0.40 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p = 0.002) and fewer sudden movements (median 14.00 vs. 21.61, p = 0.001) than their novice counterparts.ConclusionThe use of software-based video motion tracking of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a simple and viable method enabling objective assessment of surgical performance. It provides clear discrimination between expert and novice performance.

Highlights

  • The use of motion tracking has been proved to provide an objective assessment in surgical skills training

  • All participants recruited for the study were either from Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands or the participants of the Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Curriculum Grade 1 Level 1

  • Three parameters were calculated: the path length, that is the total distance the tip of the instrument has travelled during the procedure; the average distance the instrument tip moved per time frame; and the number of extreme movements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of motion tracking has been proved to provide an objective assessment in surgical skills training. The recorded videos were analysed using Kinovea 0.8.15 and the following parameters calculated the path length, average instrument movement and number of sudden or extreme movements. Results The analysed data showed that experts had significantly shorter path length (median 127 cm vs 187 cm, p = 0.01), smaller average movements (median 0.40 cm vs 0.32 cm, p = 0.002) and fewer sudden movements (median 14.00 vs 21.61, p = 0.001) than their novice counterparts. Conclusion The use of software-based video motion tracking of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a simple and viable method enabling objective assessment of surgical performance. It provides clear discrimination between expert and novice performance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call