Abstract

Four theoretical methods providing approximations to total system reliability bounds from subsystem test data are compared through a Monte Carlo study. The system bounds in question, Kraemer, El Mawazini-Buehler, Grubbs and Mann-Grubbs, are valid asymptotically, i.e. when the number of failures observed is large. However, their small sample properties, and the closed forms of their small sample distributions, are unknown. In practice, when a system cannot be tested as a whole, the number of observed failures may be small. Hence, the practical importance for the study of the small sample properties of these bounds. Lacking this information, we perform a numerical study of these small sample properties, as well as a comparison of the bounds.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.